[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071230215435.GA31386@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:54:35 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>, dpreed@...d.com,
Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> You won't bisect obscure timing triggered problems, and the _p users
> are almost all for hardware where performance doesn't matter one iota
> (eg CMOS).
actually, people have, and i have too. But i agree that io_delay=none
would be stupid now, and would probably be stupid in v2.6.26 too.
i also have a debug patch that counts the number of _p() API uses and
prints a stacktrace (once per bootup) if it occurs [wrote it 2 weeks
ago] - so i agree with you that we can do this more gradually and more
intelligently. As long as it does not turn into a BKL situation. It's
2008 in a day and we've still got the NFS client code running under the
BKL - quite ridiculous IMO.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists