[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071231232412.64347335@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:24:12 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
dpreed@...d.com, Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
> However, assuming a bus clock of 6 MHz should be safe (167 ns).
Agreed - or ISA timings directly. Boxes using WD80x3 are not going to
have a TSC so might as well stick with port 0x80 as they have done just
fine for the past 15 years.
> None of this really helps with *memory-mapped* 8390, though, since
> memory mapped writes can be posted. Putting any IOIO transaction in the
ISA isn't posted only PCI.
PCI 8390 clones seem to be a mix of ASICs and 8390x chips with
some quite disgusting FPGA glue logic.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists