lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:46 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: asm-x86/msr.h for sanitized headers: clean it or punt it Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> writes: > The current asm-x86/msr.h does not actually define anything for (!__KERNEL__ > && __i386__). For x86_64, it fails to build due to u32/u64 types being used. > Simply not installing the header seems easiest to me. Otherwise, x86_64 will > need sanitizing and i386 should have things added back, otherwise it's just a > pointless empty header. Please don't -- asm/msr.h is very useful in user space for rdtscll et.al. I use it all the time in test programs. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists