[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1199273047.6821.119.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:24:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
trem <tremyfr@...oo.fr>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:12 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2008 22:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I've seen 1s+ desktop latencies due to PREEMPT_BKL when I was still
> > using reiserfs.
>
> Fair enough; so the former ifdefery would be preferable for now then.
To be honest, I must mention that the load that did that was a kernel
build -j5 on a dual socket Athlon MP box. With a current kernel and XFS
that load is making the box slow but its still very servicable.
> > Both reiserfs and tty were fighting for the bkl and massive prio
> > inversion ensued. Turning PREEMPT_BKL off made the system usable again.
>
> Are either of those subsystems actually using the BKL to protect against
> anything else (than themselves)?
I doubt it.
IIRC Alan is working on getting tty BKL free.
> It would be sweet to have them use
> private mutexes for the job instead (although even then it probably
> wouldn't be a straight conversion)...
I tried a quick conversion of reiser3 at the time, but it really wants a
recursive lock and I couldn't be bothered to fix a 'legacy' filesystem
so I just gave up and converted the filesystem to XFS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists