linux-kernel - Re: The perfect patch - Posting a patch series (was Re: [PATCH 06/12] pci : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801021238450.14900@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:41:32 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: The perfect patch - Posting a patch series (was Re: [PATCH 06/12]
 pci : Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core)


On Jan 2 2008 12:14, Stefan Richter wrote:
>There is nothing wrong with a 0/n posting per se.  But whenever you
>write a 0/n posting, ask yourself:
>  - Isn't the information I provide here necessary to keep around by
>    somebody who takes my patch series into his quilt series or into his
>    source repository?
>  - Couldn't the information here be useful at a later point in time
>    when people look into the mainline Linux history?
>If "yes" or "maybe yes", then add this information to the changelogs in
>the patches.  You can then leave the 0/n posting as is, or make it
>briefer, or omit it entirely.

Please emit a [0/n] and the [m/n] as a reply so that threading-aware
mail readers can collapse and/or use delete-thread-at-a-time feature.
If there is no info in [0/n], let it be empty or a one,two-liner brief
introduction.

>It is never necessary to post a 0/n message, because _everything_ which
>could be said in this message can also be said in the i/n messages.
>(Things which are not meant for the SCM changelog can be written after a
>"---" delimiter line or other patch delimiters.)  However, it is
>sometimes convenient to repeat or summarize some of the information from
>the i/n messages in a 0/n message.  Think about convenience of the
>_recipients_ though, not about the sender's convenience.

And [0/n] sometimes contain a diffstat which gives an approximate
line count of how big the patchset actually is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/