[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adaprwkundh.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:51:38 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>
Cc: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, pw@....edu,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: list corruption on ib_srp load in v2.6.24-rc5
> > Can you try this?
>
> That patched oopsed in scsi_remove_host(), but reversing the order has
> survived over 500 insert/probe/remove cycles.
>
> Tested-by: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> index 950228f..77e8b90 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> @@ -2054,6 +2054,7 @@ static void srp_remove_one(struct ib_device *device)
> list_for_each_entry_safe(target, tmp_target,
> &host->target_list, list) {
> scsi_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
> + srp_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
> srp_disconnect_target(target);
Where do we stand on this? What is the right place to put the
srp_remove_host? Is there a bug somewhere else?
I'd like to get this fixed before 2.6.24 final comes out...
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists