[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080102174634.GB2189@Krystal>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:46:58 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, bryan.wu@...log.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] Fix blackfin HARDWARE_PM support
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca) wrote:
> (Robin, can you check if this patch does what is currently intended with
> HARDWARE_PM please ? This involves testing with CONFIG_OPROFILE y/m/n.)
>
> This patch restores the blackfin Hardware Performance Monitor Profiling
> support that was killed by
> commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
>
> Since there seems to be no good reason to behave differently from other
> architectures, it now automatically selects the hardware performance counters
> whenever the profiling is activated.
>
> mach-common/irqpanic.c: pm_overflow
> calls pm_overflow_handler which is in oprofile/op_model_bf533.c. I doubt that
> setting HARDWARE_PM as "m" will work at all, since the pm_overflow_handler
> should be in the core kernel image because it is called by irqpanic.c.
>
> Therefore, I change HARDWARE_PM from a tristate to a bool.
>
> The whole arch/$(ARCH)/oprofile/ is built depending on CONFIG_OPROFILE. Since
> part of the HARDWARE_PM support files sits in this directory, it makes sense to
> also depend on OPROFILE, not only PROFILING. Since OPROFILE already depends on
> PROFILING, it is correct to only depend on OPROFILE only.
>
This patch header should also include :
Problem identified by Adrian Bunk. Patch inspired by the original fix
proposed by him.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> CC: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@...ial.fi>
> CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> CC: bryan.wu@...log.com
> CC: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
> ---
> arch/blackfin/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/blackfin/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/arch/blackfin/Kconfig 2007-12-29 11:00:05.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/arch/blackfin/Kconfig 2007-12-29 11:25:39.000000000 -0500
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ config GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY
> bool
> default y
>
> +config HARDWARE_PM
> + def_bool y
> + depends on OPROFILE
> +
> source "init/Kconfig"
> source "kernel/Kconfig.preempt"
>
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists