[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080102175606.GD11496@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:56:06 -0500
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
"K. Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
dipankar@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Markers Implementation for Preempt RCU Boost Tracing
Hi -
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:01:57PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [...]
> well, -freorder-blocks seems to be default-enabled at -O2 on gcc 4.2, so
> we should already be getting that, right?
Right.
> [...] So it would be nice if we could collect all this offline code
> and stuff it away into another portion of the kernel image. (or,
> into another portion of the object file - which would still be good
> enough in practice)
That would be the -freorder-blocks-and-partition flag, as proposed by
Arjan two Februarys ago. I don't see any traces of Andi's overriding
"-fno-reorder-blocks" in the current linus tree, so maybe it's time to
resurrect this one:
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/39/196123.html
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists