linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080102190537.2fc735fe@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:05:37 +0100
From:	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, kay.sievers@...y.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	rjw@...k.pl, pavel@...e.cz, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	lenb@...nel.org, gregkh@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended 
 (rev. 2)

On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:54:00 -0800
David Bro
> It'd need to have some NTP sync solution for RTC_LIB devices, but
> ISTR the gentime stuff still assumes an update_persistent_clock()
> that doesn't sleep ... and hence can't be used with I2C based RTCs.

 I still believe NTP sync stuff should be done outside of the kernel.
 given the mean accuracy of RTC chips and other sync factors, imho
 you haven't so much to gain with an in-kernel sync code.


-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/