[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801022336.10355.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:36:09 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: "Robin Getz" <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] : Allow embedded developers USB options normally reserved for OTG
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Bryan Wu wrote:
> B.T.W, 2 questions about the MUSB driver:
> 1. What's the plan for mainline merge of the whole MUSB driver? maybe
> I can cleanup current Blackfin ports to you guys.
It might as well merge in 2.6.25-early. It'll be easier to integrate
patches that way. Including your Blackfin port. When I asked before,
nobody hugely objected to "one big patch".
> 2. Do you remember the PING issue I reported in OMAP list? How do you
> think of that?
Yes, something needs to be done. EHCI might benefit from the same
kind of patch, to cope with ill-behaved usb thumb drives.
> > I have an idea: the USB_NAKLIMIT0 should be set to some value, when we
> > got NAK timeout interrupt, we can disable PING. When enumerating normal
> > USB stick, there is no NAK timeout, because PING is efficient for
> > handshaking. While problem USB stick will generate NAK timeout
> > interrupt, we disable PING for this kind of USB device enumeration.
That sounds much better than your original patch, which disabled it
always. It might even be worth allocating a flag somewhere in the
usb_device structure to record when ep0 pings seem to misbehave.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists