linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:41:32 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, stern@...land.harvard.edu, peterz@...radead.org,
	david-b@...bell.net, davem@...emloft.net, krh@...hat.com,
	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net,
	James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
	cbou@...l.ru, dwmw2@...radead.org, khali@...ux-fr.org,
	i2c@...sensors.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:21:36PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
...
> I don't know if there's other possible warning places with this mutex
> or not,  if you have any ideas about this, please tell me.

I think lockdep is just to tell such things. So, the question is, how
much it was tested already, because if there are many warnings
reported e.g. after merging to -mm, then this could be better to re-do
it this other way... But, I hope this will not be necessary.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/