linux-kernel - Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080103112957.GA14693@lazybastard.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:29:57 +0100
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [x86] kernel/audit.c cleanup according to checkpatch.pl

On Thu, 3 January 2008 14:19:25 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void audit_log_lost(const char *message)
>  
>  	if (print) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING
> -		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
> +		       "audit: audit_lost=%d audit_rate_limit=%d "
> +		       "audit_backlog_limit=%d\n",
>  		       atomic_read(&audit_lost),
>  		       audit_rate_limit,
>  		       audit_backlog_limit);

This hunk is a bit questionable.  It can easily deceive a reader to
assume two seperate lines printed out and sometimes defeats grepping
for printk output to find the code generating the message.

Rest looks good to me.

Jörn

-- 
He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book.
-- B. Franklin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/