linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86] [12/16] Optimize lock prefix switching to run less frequently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801041317.30404.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:17:30 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] [12/16] Optimize lock prefix switching to run less frequently

On Friday 04 January 2008 10:42:17 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This makes a significant difference in boot up performance on AMD SimNow!
> > Also I expect it to be a little faster on native systems too because a smp 
> > switch does a lot of text_poke()s which each synchronize the pipeline.
> 
> Please run your patches through checkpatch.pl.
> 
> ERROR: use tabs not spaces
> #48: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:360:


I saw a lot of these warnings, but disregarded them as obviously silly. I don't
have plans to redo all the patches for that.
  
> > +
> > +		/* Only switch to UP mode if we don't immediately boot others */
> > +		if (num_possible_cpus() == 1 || max_cpus == 0)
> 
> Shouldn't this be max_cpus <= 1 ?

Don't think so, smp_init() seems to use it one off.
 
> > +extern unsigned int max_cpus;
> 
> I'm a bit wary about making max_cpus global. max_cpus is used all over
> the place as a local variable name. Can we please rename it to
> setup_max_cpus or something like that?

Hmm, I didn't see any warnings from this so surely it's not a big issue?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/