linux-kernel - Re: memory remapping, 4gb memory on 945gt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:03:35 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, felix-linuxkernel@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memory remapping, 4gb memory on 945gt

Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> Now I can understand this explanation for 32-bit mode, but I'm running
>>> in 64-bit mode.  There should be a way to use the fourth gig under
>>> Linux.  Is there?
>> The chipset limitation applies to 64bit mode as well as to 32bit mode
>> (which actually does not have a 4GB limitation with PAE)
> 
> Note that some system and memory vendors have incorrect statements
> stating that the 3.xGB limit is a 32bit OS issue on these machines
> and it'll all just work fine on 64bit OSs.
> 

Supposedly WinXP-32 doesn't use memory over 4 GB even if it is available 
(a market-segmentation decision of the part of Microsoft, to force 
people to buy WinServer 2003; WinXP SP2 does PAE so there is no 
technical reason.)  This probably has disincentivized hardware vendors 
from providing support for remapping the memory from the aperture above 
the 4 GB mark.  The logic isn't all that trivial, especially if the 
aperture size is configurable, so I can understand why they would punt.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/