linux-kernel - Re: memory remapping, 4gb memory on 945gt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:  <loom.20080104T225120-118@post.gmane.org>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: memory remapping, 4gb memory on 945gt

H. Peter Anvin <hpa <at> zytor.com> writes:

> 
> Supposedly WinXP-32 doesn't use memory over 4 GB even if it is available 
> (a market-segmentation decision of the part of Microsoft, to force 
> people to buy WinServer 2003; WinXP SP2 does PAE so there is no 
> technical reason.)  This probably has disincentivized hardware vendors 
> from providing support for remapping the memory from the aperture above 
> the 4 GB mark.  The logic isn't all that trivial, especially if the 
> aperture size is configurable, so I can understand why they would punt.
> 

The reason according to Microsoft is that enabling PAE induced driver
incompatibilities - to me it sounds quite plausible given the quality of drivers
for consumer versions of XP/Vista and the fact that 4GB RAM in consumer class
machine is a newer thing.

There is a KB document detailing the reasons for disabling >4Gb RAM in XP SP2
and later 32-bit OSes - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/888137 .

Parag

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/