[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <477DA529.4000500@rtr.ca>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:16:57 -0500
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, abelay@...ell.com,
lenb@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree
Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> Reintroduce run time configurable max_cstate for !CPU_IDLE case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,11 @@ static void (*pm_idle_save) (void) __rea
> #define PM_TIMER_TICKS_TO_US(p) (((p) * 1000)/(PM_TIMER_FREQUENCY/1000))
>
> static unsigned int max_cstate __read_mostly = ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> module_param(max_cstate, uint, 0000);
> +#else
> +module_param(max_cstate, uint, 0644);
> +#endif
> static unsigned int nocst __read_mostly;
> module_param(nocst, uint, 0000);
>
..
I'll try and re-test with this on Friday.
Meanwhile, can you give a short summary of how behaviour differs
between CONFIG_CPU_IDLE and !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE ??
I'm not at all clear on how this really affects things.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists