linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <11223.1199425297@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:41:37 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Eric Anopolsky <erpo41@...il.com>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, sct@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@...sterfs.com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN

On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:51:32 PST, Eric Anopolsky said:

> their own kernels in the first place. IMHO, it's reasonable to expect
> the small minority of Linux users who want to compile their own kernels
> to learn that "EXPERIMENTAL" means something.

And what, exactly, does it mean, given that there's a bunch of stuff that's
tagged EXPERIMENTAL that's more solid/tested than a lot of stuff that *isn't*
marked with it?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped