linux-kernel - general config preemption Q: preempt-model and Big-Lock Preemption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:25:24 -0800
From:	Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: general config preemption Q: preempt-model and Big-Lock Preemption

A question that comes to mind every time I go through the settings
for "Preemption Model" and "Preempt The Big Kernel Lock".

Do each of the combinations "make sense", or are some "no-ops"?
For model, we have 1) no forced (server), 2) Voluntary (Desktop)
3) preemptible (low-latency Desktop), and for Big Lock Preemption (BLP),
we have "yes" or "no".

Questions:

1) What is the difference between "no forced" and "voluntary"?  Doesn't
  voluntary normally mean "not forced"?

2) If a process is not preemptible, then it seems this would be "doubly
  so" in the kernel when the big-lock is held.  So does the big-lock
  preemption question have any effect (when preempt-model="no forced").

3) If a process is "fully preemptible" but "BLP=false", is that
  much different than "voluntary preemption" & BLP=false?  I.e. --
  should 'preemptible kernel' also imply "BLP=true"...i.e.

_Should_ (would?) the following change be "somewhat" identical to
current config options:

  O1) "Preempt Model"="no-forced preemption" (would set
  preempt-big-kern-lock to FALSE and doesn't display that question).

  O2) "Voluntary Preemption" (presuming there are voluntary preemption
  points in the kernel in places where the big-K-lock is held), then
  configuration would still ask whether to  "Preempt The Big Kernel Lock".

  O3) "Preemptible model"="allow-kernel-preemption" (would set
  preempt-big-kern-lock to TRUE and doesn't display that question).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/