[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080105150944.GA9595@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:09:44 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Miguel Botón <mboton.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: little fix in 'include/asm-x86/topology.h'
* Miguel Botón <mboton.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> Before 'topology_32.h' and 'topology_64.h' were unified, topology
> defines in a X86_64 kernel were declared if CONFIG_SMP was enabled.
> Now, post unification, these same defines in a X86_64 kernel are only
> being declared if CONFIG_NUMA and CONFIG_SMP are enabled.
>
> This, for example, breaks 'perfmon_amd64.c' compilation.
>
> This patch defines ENABLE_TOPO_DEFINE if this is a X86_64 kernel and
> we have SMP support enabled.
hm, do you have a .config that fails to build?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists