linux-kernel - Re: [patch 5/5] PowerPC: switch to generic WARN_ON / BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:46:20 -0600
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] PowerPC: switch to generic WARN_ON / BUG_ON

On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:16:04PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 19:12 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> > 
> > Not using the ppc-specific WARN_ON/BUG_ON constructs actually saves about
> > 4K text on a ppc64_defconfig.  The main reason seems to be that prepping
> > the arguments to the conditional trap instructions is more work than just
> > doing a compare and branch.
> 
> I'm a bit annoyed by that one ... for obvious reasons... I wish gcc
> could be better here. Also, we can't completely remove the support for
> the trap since we use that in asm in various places...

The support isn't removed, and the trap is still used. This patch has
been posted a bunch of times before and been in -mm for quite a while.


-Olof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/