| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080106152417.5cb3d186@morte> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:24:17 +0100 From: Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:38:53 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > > > Subject : jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3 > > Submitter : Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it> > > Date : 2007-11-29 08:36 > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/53 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9475 > > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/132 > > this holds a series of problems, we've applied everything we wanted to > 2.6.24 already we'll do the full stack of fixes for this in 2.6.25. > (changing printk was deemed inappropriate so late in the -rc cycle) So > perhaps mark this as WILL_FIX_LATER and unmark it as a regression? > Stefano, do you agree? Agreed. > b43 works fine for you in the latest .24-rc kernel, correct? Correct. :) -- Ciao Stefano -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists