linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82e4877d0801060821r2ec43a9em6b4b6a8f763af7c8@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:21:41 -0500
From:	"Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Sunday, 6 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > Subject             : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
> > > Submitter   : "Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
> > > Date                : 2007-12-07 18:14
> > > References  : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/299
> > >               http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9525
> > > Handled-By  : "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> > >               Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > >               Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> >
> > i think this only occurs with cpuidle, right? drivers/cpuidle/ and
> > CPU_IDLE is new in 2.6.24 so this appears to be a bug in that code (or a
> > bug elsewhere triggered by that code), not a regression from v2.6.23.
>
> OK, removed from the regressions list.

Nope - actually it did happen without CPU_IDLE so it is definitely a regression.
(See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/93 )

And it does happen with latest git which I believe has your patch Ingo.

So I would suggest to keep it on the list of regressions.

Thanks

Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/