linux-kernel - Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47811004.6070307@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:29:40 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done"

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> If lkml traffic is too big then i'd suggest to set up email 
> filters to separate out mails that have 'SCSI' in their subject line

Good idea.  Minor flaw:  If somebody forgets to Cc LSML, he might also
forget to put SCSI or scsi into the Subject.

> or body.

This yields false positives whenever a .config is posted.

Also, filtering based on message body contents is costlier than
filtering by headers.  I for one use Sieve to sort mails into different
IMAP folders at my mail provider's server, and I think Sieve doesn't
offer tests for patterns in message bodies at all.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- ---= --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/