linux-kernel - Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:36:23 -0600
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: revert "[SCSI] Get rid of scsi_cmnd->done"


On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 10:11 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 09:20:45AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This bug was actually hidden in bugzilla for ages, where Matthew Wilcox
> > was trying to deal with it on his own.  The first I heard of it (apart
> > from a linux-scsi question on 13 November, when regrettably, I was busy
> > with other things) was on 18 Dec when Natalie added me to the bugzilla
> > cc list.  The first thing I did on that date was finger pktcdvd and add
> > Jens to the cc list ... however, since there was no mailing list thread
> > to follow he ended up asking for context which no-one provided.
> 
> Not true.  I sent my response to the bug to linux-scsi and cc'd bugzilla.
> Unfortunately, the bug reporter sent the information requested to bugzilla
> instead of linux-scsi.  So it got lost and overlooked.
> 
> If there's willingness to change, I'm willing to put some effort into
> moving us to a bug tracking system that fits our workflow better than
> bugzilla.  But if that effort will be disregarded, then let me know now
> so I don't waste my time.

Well, I'd say yes, certainly, and I'll support the effort ... but the
problem is that I'm not one of the powers that be who control our
current bugzilla ... that's the constituency we need to convince.  As I
keep saying, just getting new SCSI bug reports tipped onto the SCSI
mailing list will give us about 90% of what we need, but I haven't even
managed to get that to happen.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/