linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080106093853.GD26291@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:38:53 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23


* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

> Subject		: jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
> Submitter	: Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>
> Date		: 2007-11-29 08:36
> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/53
> 		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9475
> Handled-By	: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/132

this holds a series of problems, we've applied everything we wanted to 
2.6.24 already we'll do the full stack of fixes for this in 2.6.25. 
(changing printk was deemed inappropriate so late in the -rc cycle) So 
perhaps mark this as WILL_FIX_LATER and unmark it as a regression? 
Stefano, do you agree? b43 works fine for you in the latest .24-rc 
kernel, correct?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/