[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080106094504.GE26291@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:45:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@...il.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Subject : soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
> Submitter : "Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
> Date : 2007-12-07 18:14
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/299
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9525
> Handled-By : "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
i think this only occurs with cpuidle, right? drivers/cpuidle/ and
CPU_IDLE is new in 2.6.24 so this appears to be a bug in that code (or a
bug elsewhere triggered by that code), not a regression from v2.6.23.
this commit might also have improved things:
------------>
commit 2bacec8c318ca0418c0ee9ac662ee44207765dd4
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue Dec 18 15:21:13 2007 +0100
sched: touch softlockup watchdog after idling
touch softlockup watchdog after idling.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
<------------
albeit Parag reported actual real, human-noticeable delays in system
behavior and those cannot be false positives.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists