[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080107084528.GA8365@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:45:28 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, peterz@...radead.org,
david-b@...bell.net, davem@...emloft.net, jarkao2@...il.com,
krh@...hat.com, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
cbou@...l.ru, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:09:44AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> Thanks for your comment, I rewrite it for 2.6.24-rc7 as a all-in-one
> patch, please see following. Drop i2c maintainer and list in cc
> because there's no changes about i2c in this patch:
>
> Convert semaphore to mutex in struct class
Most of the non-driver core code should be converted to not use the
lock in the class at all. They should use a local lock instead.
So how about a patch series that removes the usage of the current
semaphore from the different drivers, and then, a single patch that
converts the semaphore to mutex in the class code, it should not touch
anything outside of the drivers/base/ directory (not including the
driver.h file.)
Sound reasonable?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists