[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4781E6BB.2010900@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:45:47 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] sg_ring: a ring of scatterlist arrays
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 17:37:41 Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Hi Tejun,
>>>
>>> Nice try! Even ignoring the ugliness of undoing such an operation if
>>> the caller doesn't expect you to mangle their chains, consider a
>>> one-element sg array. :(
>> Heh heh, that can be dealt with by skipping the first chain if the first
>> chain is empty after chaining. Please take a look at
>> ata_sg_setup_extra() in the following.
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tj/libata-dev.git;a=blob;f=driver
>> s/ata/libata-core.c;h=32dde5bbc75ed53e89ac17040da2cd0621a37161;hb=c8847e473a
>> 4a2844244784226eb362be10d52ce9
>>
>> That said, yeah, it's seriously ugly. Restoring the original sg is ugly
>> too. I definitely agree that we need some improvements here.
>
> Erk, that's beyond ugly, into actual evil.
/me agrees.
> To make this general you need to find the last N 1-element chains (but SCSI
> doesn't do this of course). Oh the horror...
/me agrees.
> I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that the sg_ring ata patches were
> straightforward, and indescribably beautiful if compared to this!
/me agrees. As long as this can be made sane using one unified
interface, I don't care whether it's sg_ring, table or dish.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists