lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080108144702.a5c0624f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:47:02 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ecryptfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	thighlan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Load each file decryption key only once

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:17:33 -0600
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:05:30PM -0600, Trevor Highland wrote:
> > eCryptfs: Load each file decryption key only once
> > 
> > There is no need to keep re-setting the same key for any given
> > eCryptfs inode. This patch optimizes the use of the crypto API and
> > helps performance a bit.
> 
> There is no reason for the crypt_stat->key value for any given
> eCryptfs inode to change during the life of the inode, and each
> crypt_stat gets its own crypto transform, so I do not see a problem
> with Trevor's suggestion. It will save unnecessary calls to
> crypto_blkcipher_setkey(), and I expect it will speed things up a
> little.
> 
> I include an updated patch against 2.6.24-rc7.
> 

Your new patch clashes horridly with the pending
ecryptfs-set-inode-key-only-once-per-crypto-operation.patch.

I shall drop ecryptfs-load-each-file-decryption-key-only-once.patch and shall
then sit back and sulk.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ