linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080108224837.GA19623@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:48:37 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
Cc:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
	dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	a.zummo@...ertech.it, peterz@...radead.org, cbou@...l.ru,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	krh@...hat.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, jarkao2@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] convert semaphore to mutex in struct class

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 03:05:10PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 1:20 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:13:37PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > It's already in the driver core to the most part.  It remains to be seen
> > > what is less complicated in the end:  Transparent mutex-protected list
> > > accesses provided by driver core (requires the iterator), or all the
> > > necessary locking done by the drivers themselves (requires some more
> > > lock-taking but perhaps fewer lock instances overall in the drivers, and
> > > respective redefinitions and documentation of the driver core API).
> >
> > I favor changing the driver core api and doing this kind of thing there.
> > It keeps the drivers simpler and should hopefully make their lives
> > easier.
> 
> What about this?
> 
> #define class_for_each_dev(pos, head, member) \
>         for (mutex_lock(&(container_of(head, struct class, devices))->mutex), po
> s = list_entry((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member); \
>         prefetch(pos->member.next), &pos->member != (head) ? 1 : (mutex_unlock(&
> (container_of(head, struct class, devices))->mutex), 0); \
>         pos = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))

Eeek, just make the thing a function please, where you pass the iterator
function in, like the driver core has (driver_for_each_device)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/