[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478405DA.40303@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:23:06 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> threw this into the random test setup: it found the attached config
> after a few iterations, which needed the fix below. (config builds and
> boots fine with this fix)
>
> the problem was that set_pud() is used by
> include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h, to build set_pgd():
>
> #define set_pgd(pgdptr, pgdval) set_pud((pud_t *)(pgdptr), (pud_t) { pgdval })
>
Oh, yeah. That's bitten me before, but I guess I lost that part of the
patch somewhere :(.
> it's truly a maze ... took me 10 straight minutes of staring at the code
> to figure out where the set_pud() came from :-/
>
It's pretty awful. The pagetable level folding stuff is fairly deep
into "too clever" territory, but its hard to see what better
alternatives there are... Dropping non-PAE support would be nice, but
impractical given that even relatively recent chips are missing support
for it.
> anyway, your patchset is holding up pretty good so far in testing.
>
Great!
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists