[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47840D00.8000907@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:53:36 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> i had the patch below for v2, it's still needed (because i didnt
>>> apply the s390/etc. bits), right?
>> Well the patch really should go through mm because it is a change that
>> covers multiple arches. I think testing with this is fine. I think
>> Mike has diffed this against Linus tree so this works but will now
>> conflict with the modcopy patch already in mm.
>
> well we cannot really ack it for x86 inclusion without having tested it
> through, so it will stay in x86.git for some time. That approach found a
> few problems with v1 already. In any case, v3 is looking pretty good so
> far - and it's cool stuff - i'm all for unifying/generalizing arch code.
>
> Ingo
Hi Ingo,
You probably will want to pick up V4 though I didn't add that ifndef
patch you mentioned earlier. There are no functional changes, basically
only a rebasing on the correct mm version.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists