[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080108235846.GA17067@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:58:46 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/11] sched: rt-group: uid-group interface
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 12:35:32AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 15:31 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 12:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 16:27 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:57:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Subject: sched: rt-group: add uid-group interface
> > > > >
> > > > > Extend the /sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/ interface to allow setting
> > > > > the group's rt_period and rt_runtime.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Peter,
> > > >
> > > > Cool stuff! I will try out these patches and try to give you some
> > > > feedback.
> > >
> > > Thanks, much appreciated!
> > >
> > > > One request though, could you please add some documentation to
> > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-uids?
> > >
> > > I already have documentation on the todo list, I'll add this file to
> > > that list :-)
> >
> > Care to rebase the patch against -mm, we fixed the mixed-up usage
> > of ksets and kobjects, and this can not apply anymore:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/patches.git;a=blob;f=driver/struct-user_info-sysfs.patch;hb=HEAD
> >
> > There is also an attribute group now which makes it much easier to add
> > new files.
>
> Ingo, Greg,
>
> What would be the easiest way to carry this forward? sched-devel and
> greg's tree would intersect at this point and leave poor akpm with the
> resulting mess. Should I just make an incremental patch akpm can carry
> and push? Or can we base one tree off the other?
If it's just a single patch for this, I'd be glad to take it. But by
looking at the [11/12] above, I doubt this is so...
If it's not that rough (12 patches is not a big deal), I'd be glad to
take these through my tree, after you fix up Kay's requests above :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists