[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080108054105.GC5393@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:11:05 +0530
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixer <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, vgoyal@...hat.com,
hbabu@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: handle an initrd in highmem (version 2)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:02:53PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The boot protocol has until now required that the initrd be located in
> lowmem, which makes the lowmem/highmem boundary visible to the boot
> loader. This was exported to the bootloader via a compile-time
> field. Unfortunately, the vmalloc= command-line option breaks this
> part of the protocol; instead of adding yet another hack that affects
> the bootloader, have the kernel relocate the initrd down below the
> lowmem boundary inside the kernel itself.
>
> Note that this does not rely on HIGHMEM being enabled in the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> ---
> Fix crash on NUMA reported by Dhaval Giani (reported as being a kexec issue.)
>
Yep, it does that. Just tested that on top of the x86 git tree (the mm
queue). It boots.
Tested-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
regards,
Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists