[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080109082132.001fd339@poseidon.drzeus.cx>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:21:32 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:44:08 -0500
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 3:49 PM, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx> wrote:
> > So, again, if you feel that there is a hardware difference between 4-bit MMC and 4-bit SD then please elaborate as it is my understanding that they are identical.
>
> you may be 100% correct, i have no idea, i'm not really familiar with
> MMC/SD/SDIO at all.
The patch adds complexity to the system. So until you can convince me that complexity is actually needed, I'm afraid the answer is NAK.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists