[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080109080620.GE32560@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:06:20 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
Cc: grant@...que.net, tim@...erelk.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change paride driver to use unlocked_ioctl instead of
ioctl
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:44:20AM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> -static int pt_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
> - unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +static long pt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long
> arg)
this looks line-wrapper by your mailer.
> - if (copy_from_user(&mtop, p, sizeof(struct mtop)))
> + if (copy_from_user(&mtop, p, sizeof(struct mtop))) {
> + unlock_kernel();
> return -EFAULT;
> + }
>
> switch (mtop.mt_op) {
>
> case MTREW:
> pt_rewind(tape);
> + unlock_kernel();
It's generally considered good style to only have as few as possible
return values. And this is especially important when returning from
a section that's under a lock. So in this case it would be much better
if you changes this function to have a local 'int error' variable
and then just do
error = -EFOO;
goto out_unlock;
wherever you have an early return with the end of the function looking
like
out_unlock:
unlock_kernel();
return error;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists