[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0801091502570.3148@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:05:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Simon Holm Thogersen <odie@...aau.dk>,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] syslets: add generic syslets infrastructure
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Try this with and without a "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" in
> between. Both are real and relevant usage cases, I think.
Side note, for me the difference on my home directory for the cached vs
uncached case is 5 seconds vs 5 minutes. I like the 5 sec, I'd like to
improve on that 5 min.
Is this test a bit *too* simplistic? Probably. But I think that if we can
come up with an interface that works ok for that test, it at least signals
*something*.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists