[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801101601000.25041@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:01:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>, grant@...que.net,
tim@...erelk.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change paride driver to use unlocked_ioctl instead of
ioctl
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > default:
> > > > printk("%s: Unimplemented ioctl 0x%x\n", tape->name, cmd);
> > > > + unlock_kernel();
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > Surely a bug ... shouldn't this return -ENOTTY?
> Agreed - ENOTTY.
Just out of curiosity, where does POSIX happen to specify ENOTTY as the
correct one for unimplemented ioctl?
--
Jiri Kosina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists