linux-kernel - Re: [UNIONFS] 00/29 Unionfs and related patches pre-merge review (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080110150808.GA32080@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:08:08 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	hch@...radead.org, viro@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [UNIONFS] 00/29 Unionfs and related patches pre-merge review
	(v2)

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:59:19AM -0500, Erez Zadok wrote:
> 
> Dear Linus, Al, Christoph, and Andrew,
> 
> As per your request, I'm posting for review the unionfs code (and related
> code) that's in my korg tree against mainline (v2.6.24-rc7-71-gfd0b45d).
> This is in preparation for merge in 2.6.25.

Huh?  There's still aboslutely not fix to the underlying problems of
the whole idea.   I think we made it pretty clear that unionfs is not
the way to go, and that we'll get the union mount patches clear once
the per-mountpoint r/o and unprivilegued mount patches series are in
and stable.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/