[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080112044536.GA31404@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:45:36 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO #6 retry 08/21] Utility functions and policy
manipulationinterface.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 11:06:17AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> James Morris wrote:
> > > > TOMOYO Linux uses /sys/kernel/security/tomoyo interface for configuration.
> > >
> > > Why aren't you using securityfs for this? (It was designed for LSMs).
> >
> > Doh, it is using securityfs, don't worry.
> >
> I got a mm-commits mail titled
> "+ sysfs-make-sysfs_deprecated-depend-on-sysfs.patch added to -mm tree" .
>
> Is sysfs going to be deprecated?
No, there is a config option, CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED which enables some
older sysfs symlinks and layouts. That patch from Randy Dunlap was just
fixing up some config dependancies that were found, that's all.
> If sysfs becomes not available at /sys/ , where securityfs is going to be mounted?
sysfs is not going away any time soon, don't worry :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists