[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080112.141224.06844600.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:12:24 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, vaf@...co.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/001] ipv4: enable use of 240/4 address space
In article <20080111.174857.258424243.davem@...emloft.net> (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:48:57 -0800 (PST)), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
>
> > There is no positive consesus on this draft
> > at the intarea meeting in Vancouver, right?
> >
> > We cannot / should not enable that space until we have reached
> > a consensus on it.
>
> This is so incredibly incorrect.
>
> There is consensus on making network stacks able to use this
> address space. And that is all that the patch does.
No, we did never make consensus on it.
> The consensus is only missing on whether to make the address
> space public or private.
>
> This is also clearly spelled out in the draft.
>
> It is important to get as large of a head start on this as
> possible because of how long it takes to deploy something
> like this.
Okay, though I am afraid this space will not be used widely,
we should be ready for it.
I'll make some more comments on the patch itself from
another point view.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists