linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC][BUG] msync: updating ctime and mtime at syncing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:40:44 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
	jesper.juhl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC][BUG] msync: updating ctime and mtime at
	syncing


On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 10:36 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 03:44 +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> 
> > +/*
> > + * Update the ctime and mtime stamps after checking if they are to be updated.
> > + */
> > +void mapped_file_update_time(struct file *file)
> > +{
> > +	if (test_and_clear_bit(AS_MCTIME, &file->f_mapping->flags)) {
> > +		get_file(file);
> > +		file_update_time(file);
> > +		fput(file);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> 
> I don't think you need the get/put file stuff here, because

BTW, the reason for me noticing this is that if it would be needed there
is a race condition right there, who is to say that the file pointer
you're deref'ing in your test condition isn't a dead one already.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/