linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc7, intel audio: alsa doesn't say a beep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:41:21 +0100
From:	Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@...nline.de>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7, intel audio: alsa doesn't say a beep

Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
> Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> Hm...  Just to be sure, try the patch below.  It's a clean up patch
>>> that I'd like to apply later.
>>>
>> Sorry, no sound.
> 
> OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
> Could you check?
> 
> Also, what exactly did you test?  "No sound" means that no sound from
> the headphone / line-out or from the speaker?
> 
> One interesting test would be to increase the value of udelay() in the
> reverted patch.  What happens if it's set to 500?
> 

There is no udelay() in the reverted patch. If I replace "udelay(10)"
by "udelay(500)" in the original rc7, then there is still no sound.

This is like fishing in the dark. We've got a working version. Why not
keep it?


Regards

Harri

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/