[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4789B2F8.5010800@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:43:04 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, tcamuso@...hat.com,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Martin Mares <mj@....cz>, Loic Prylli <loic@...i.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
"Chumbalkar, Nagananda" <Nagananda.Chumbalkar@...com>,
"Schoeller, Patrick (Linux - Houston, TX)" <Patrick.Schoeller@...com>,
Bhavana Nagendra <bnagendr@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver
opt-in
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 08:42:48PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> Wanne bet there'll be devices that screw this up? THere's devices that even screwed
>> up the 64-256 region after all.
>
> I don't know if they 'screwed it up'. There are devices that misbehave
> when registers are read from pci config space. But this was never
> guaranteed to be a safe thing to do; it gradualy became clear that
> people expected to be able to read random registers and manufacturers
> responded accordingly, but I don't think you were ever guaranteed to be
> able to peek at bits of config space arbitrarily.
Quite correct... Reading registers can have all sorts of side effects,
for example clearing chip conditions.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists