[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200208085.6896.134.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:08:05 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Martin Mares <mj@....cz>,
Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com>, Loic Prylli <loic@...i.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver
opt-in
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 17:40 +0300, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
>
> Actually I'm strongly against Arjan's patch. First, it's based on
> assumption that the MMCONFIG thing is sort of fundamentally broken
> on some systems, but none of the facts we have so far does confirm
> that.
> And second, I really don't like the implementation as it breaks all
> non-x86 arches (or forces them to add a set of totally meaningless
> PCI functions).
I agree, I quite dislike it too. Even If the breakage on x86 makes us
want to totally disable it there, it can be done within the existing PCI
ops I believe.
I think Arjan's problem is to try to do it per-device since the
"standard" PCI ops don't get a pci_dev structure (for obvious reasons).
But from what I read in this thread, this per-device enabling/disabling
doesn't seem very useful at all.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists