[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200390535.3505.62.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:48:55 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/3] i386 boot: replace boot_ioremap with enhanced
bt_ioremap
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 09:44 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > This patchset replaces boot_ioremap with a enhanced version of
> > bt_ioremap and renames the bt_ioremap to early_ioremap. This reduces
> > 12k from .init.data segment and increases the size of memory that can
> > be re-mapped before paging_init to 64k.
>
> in latest x86.git#mm there's an early_ioremap() introduced as part of
> the PAT series - available on both 32-bit and 64-bit. Could you take a
> look at it and use that if it's OK for your purposes?
After checking the early_ioremap() implementation in
arch/x86/kernel/setup_32.c, I found that it is a duplication of
bt_ioremap() implementation in arch/x86/mm/ioremap_32.c. Both
implementations use set_fixmap(), so they can be used only after
paging_init().
The early_ioremap implementation provided in this patchset works as
follow:
- Enhances bt_ioremap, make it usable before paging_init() via a
dedicated PTE page.
- Rename bt_ioremap to early_ioremap
So I think maybe we should replace the early_ioremap() implementation in
PAT series with that of this series.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists