[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JEiUT-0000qO-MY@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:53:53 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: salikhmetov@...il.com
CC: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, miklos@...redi.hu, linux-mm@...ck.org,
jakob@...hought.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
valdis.kletnieks@...edu, riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk,
staubach@...hat.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
protasnb@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] updating ctime and mtime at syncing
> Thanks for your review, Peter and Miklos!
>
> I overlooked this case when AS_MCTIME flag has been turned off and the
> page is still dirty.
>
> On the other hand, the words "shall be marked for update" may be
> considered as just setting the AS_MCTIME flag, not updating the time
> stamps.
>
> What do you think about calling mapping_update_time() inside of "if
> (MS_SYNC & flags)"? I suggest such change because the code for
> analysis of the case you've mentioned above seems impossible to me.
I think that's a good idea. As a first iteration, just updating the
mtime/ctime in msync(MS_SYNC) and remove_vma() (called at munmap time)
would be a big improvement over what we currently have.
I would also recommend, that you drop mapping_update_time() and the
related functions from the patch, and just use file_update_time()
instead.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists