[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4df4ef0c0801150246r56675627nf669812ec9daff89@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:46:34 +0300
From: "Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@...il.com>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, protasnb@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] updating ctime and mtime at syncing
2008/1/15, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>:
> > Thanks for your review, Peter and Miklos!
> >
> > I overlooked this case when AS_MCTIME flag has been turned off and the
> > page is still dirty.
> >
> > On the other hand, the words "shall be marked for update" may be
> > considered as just setting the AS_MCTIME flag, not updating the time
> > stamps.
> >
> > What do you think about calling mapping_update_time() inside of "if
> > (MS_SYNC & flags)"? I suggest such change because the code for
> > analysis of the case you've mentioned above seems impossible to me.
>
> I think that's a good idea. As a first iteration, just updating the
> mtime/ctime in msync(MS_SYNC) and remove_vma() (called at munmap time)
> would be a big improvement over what we currently have.
>
> I would also recommend, that you drop mapping_update_time() and the
> related functions from the patch, and just use file_update_time()
> instead.
Thank you for your recommendations. I will submit my new solution shortly.
By the way, I've already changed the unlink_file_vma() function.
>
> Miklos
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists