[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080115183056.GB6723@cvg>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:30:56 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
Cc: apw@...dowen.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add filename in the summary
[Paolo Ciarrocchi - Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:23:39PM +0100]
| Add a filename option (default to 0)
| in order to get the following summary output:
| ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --filename --file ./arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c
| ...
| ...
| ...
| ./arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c --> total: 18 errors, 3 warnings, 186 lines checked
| ---
|
| Andy,
| I wonder why checkpatch doesn't show all the command line options.
| At the moment, it only prints:
| options: -q => quiet
| --no-tree => run without a kernel tree
| --terse => one line per report
| --emacs => emacs compile window format
| --file => check a source file
| --strict => enable more subjective tests
| --root => path to the kernel tree root
|
| but I see a lot more options:
| q|quiet
| tree
| signoff
| patch
| test-type
| emacs
| terse
| file
| subjective
| strict
| root=s
| summary
| mailback
|
|
|
Hi Paolo,
the options you're complaining about (in most) are enabled by default so
there is no reason to 'turn them on' explicitly /methink/.
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists