[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5927F7A4-D42A-40F6-AE9C-EDA34738A752@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:31:13 -0600
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...escale.com>,
Poonam.Aggrwal@...escale.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
rubini@...ion.unipv.it, linux-ppcdev@...abs.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael.Barkowski@...escale.com, ashish.kalra@...escale.com,
Rich.Cutler@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:51 -0600
> Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...escale.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:20 -0700
>> "Aggrwal Poonam" <Poonam.Aggrwal@...escale.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All
>>>
>>> I am waiting for more feedback on the patches.
>>>
>>> If there are no objections please consider them for 2.6.25.
>>>
>> if this isn't going to go through Alessandro Rubini/misc drivers, can
>> it go through the akpm/mm tree?
>>
>
> That would work. But it might be more appropriate to go Kumar-
> >paulus->Linus.
I'm ok w/taking the arch/powerpc bits, but I"m a bit concerned about
the driver itself. I'm wondering if we need a TDM framework in the
kernel.
I guess if Poonam could possibly describe how this driver is actually
used that would be helpful. I see we have 8315 with a discrete TDM
block and I'm guessing 82xx/85xx based CPM parts of some form of TDM
as well.
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists